Monday, November 17, 2025

The History of Langley City: Part 2

In the last episode, we explored how Langley Prairie was built on connection — from the portage routes of the First Peoples to railway lines and the ambitions of early settlers.

However, it wasn’t all rainbows and sunshine for Langley Prairie property owners; they felt ignored by the Langley Council of the day, which refused to invest in basic infrastructure for their community, like sidewalks, sewer lines, and streetlights. One bold vote forever changed the map in the 1950s.

This is the story of how Langley Prairie became Langley City and its fight to have a voice.

Thursday, November 13, 2025

Tips for Running an Effective Meeting (Even for Stratas and Non-Profits)

Over the past few years, Langley City’s Corporate Officer and Council have been updating our processes and procedures as part of our overall “Achieve Organizational Excellence” core focus area for the City. As you can imagine, meetings are important to local governments as this is how business gets done. How we manage these meetings and ourselves during them is important. While I normally don’t post too much detail on process improvement work at the City, I’ve attended and participated in enough government, strata, and non-profit meetings (spicy and not) over the years to know that this information may be useful for many other community members. Better-run meetings lead to better outcomes.

There are key things to consider for meetings to be successful and to protect the rights of different people or stakeholders.

Majority Viewpoints: The majority viewpoint is what moves forward.

Minority Viewpoints: People with a different viewpoint from the majority viewpoint have the right to be heard and to present their views.

People Absent from the Meeting: People must be informed of when and where a meeting will take place with adequate notice and have the right to know the outcomes of a meeting.

All Individuals Attending a Meeting: Following the correct procedure, everyone who has the right to participate in a meeting can participate, put forward recommendations, and vote.

The Organization for which the Meeting is Held: The organization has the right to good governance and well-run meetings.

Now, I know these fundamental principles seem super basic, but I’ve seen meetings go off the rails because these principles aren’t followed. I’ve attended strata meetings where people didn’t have the right to fully participate, where people didn’t accept the outcomes of a vote, and when things degraded into yelling matches.

Now diving a little deeper, there are some best practices to help ensure your meetings will run smoothly.

Order and Efficiency: Have an agenda and follow it. Add suggested timings for each topic to ensure the meeting runs on time. The meeting chair must ensure that the meeting runs on time and adheres to the fundamental principle.

Focus: Ensure that you have a focused discussion that avoids repetition or rehashing. Focus on the topic at hand.

Equality: Ensure that everyone has the opportunity to share a view, and also limit the time someone can speak on each topic. This protects both majority and minority viewpoints.

Decorum: Do not yell, use crude language, question someone's motives, or interrupt someone who is sharing a viewpoint that you don’t support. When you feel the temperature rising in a room, it is okay to ask for a quick break to help cool things down.

You may find yourself in a meeting where someone is intentionally creating chaos and disruption. I’ve seen this happen in strata meetings I’ve attended in the past. By incorporating some of the recommendations outlined in this post into your meetings, you can help ensure that they run as smoothly as possible, allowing for good discussion and informed decision-making. If you want to learn more, I suggest you read the book “101 Boardroom Problems and How to Solve Them.”

Langley City Council committed to continuing the process of improving our meetings at the October 20th meeting.

Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Comparison of Metro Vancouver Municipal Property Taxes and Utilities in 2025

As part of the annual budget, Langley City staff provide a breakdown of the average property taxes paid by apartment and townhouse owners, as well as by detached house owners, by municipality for the previous year. In Langley City, unlike some other municipalities, we also include property tax and utilities on the same invoice for residential properties. While Langley City has always provided a breakdown of the average city-controlled property tax paid, this year, City staff also included city-controlled utilities in the breakdown.

About 70% of residential properties in Langley City are apartments and townhouses. The following shows the average municipal-controlled property taxes and utilities paid in 2025 for apartment and townhouse property owners by municipality.

Municipality Property Tax Utility Fees Total
District of North Vancouver $1,617.62 $1,704.70 $3,322.32
Maple Ridge $1,751.16 $1,503.16 $3,254.32
Vancouver $1,818.55 $1,380.00 $3,198.55
New Westminster $1,933.09 $1,131.26 $3,064.35
Port Moody $2,237.62 $806.00 $3,043.62
Langley Township $1,480.47 $1,549.16 $3,029.63
White Rock $1,924.01 $994.00 $2,918.01
Coquitlam $1,805.82 $1,055.00 $2,860.82
Surrey $1,568.18 $1,014.76 $2,582.94
City of North Vancouver $1,692.04 $875.00 $2,567.04
Port Coquitlam $1,522.06 $975.00 $2,497.06
Richmond $1,522.70 $900.00 $2,422.70
Delta $1,857.76 $528.00 $2,385.76
Langley City $1,353.94 $854.14 $2,208.08
Burnaby $1,283.92 $755.77 $2,039.69

About 30% of residential properties in Langley City are detached homes. The following shows the average municipal-controlled property taxes and utilities paid in 2025 for detached property owners by municipality.

Municipality Property Tax Utility Fees Total
White Rock $4,879.21 $1,945.00 $6,824.21
New Westminster $4,614.88 $2,071.52 $6,686.40
Port Moody $4,792.21 $1,280.00 $6,072.21
District of North Vancouver $3,876.34 $2,027.40 $5,903.74
Vancouver $3,349.81 $2,040.00 $5,389.81
City of North Vancouver $3,738.52 $1,643.44 $5,381.96
Coquitlam $3,728.24 $1,335.00 $5,063.24
Richmond $3,611.15 $1,332.00 $4,943.15
Maple Ridge $3,421.45 $1,503.16 $4,924.61
Surrey $3,172.33 $1,556.97 $4,729.30
Burnaby $3,358.25 $1,358.71 $4,716.96
Pitt Meadows $3,189.19 $1,397.72 $4,586.91
Langley City $3,194.31 $1,372.98 $4,567.29
Delta $3,341.40 $1,115.00 $4,456.40
Langley Township $2,835.13 $1,549.16 $4,384.29
Port Coquitlam $3,004.11 $1,160.00 $4,164.11

Some points to clarify. Average means that some people will pay more and some will pay less in property taxes and utility fees. Additionally, one of the benefits of living in Metro Vancouver is that you can live in a community that suits your needs. Each community offers different amenities, which can impact property tax rates. A municipality with a higher or lower property tax rate does not necessarily mean one is better than the other. Some municipalities do not participate in the survey, which is why they are not in the tables. Finally, the utility rates do not include solid waste because there is a wide variance in the service provided in the region. For example, Maple Ridge does not provide solid waste services; you must contract for them yourself. In Langley City, we only provide the services to detached houses and non-strata townhouses. For all-in data, please check out a previous blog post.

Monday, November 10, 2025

Council-Initiated Motions at October 20th and November 3rd Meetings

Langley City Council addressed a series of council-initiated motions at its regular meetings on October 20th and November 3rd.

Council voted unanimously to have staff do no work or action on the topic of amalgamation, but to pursue opportunities to share services with neighboring municipalities where it makes sense. Council also voted unanimously to send a letter to the Minister of Housing and Municipal Affairs to inquire about the next steps to designate Langley City as a HEART & HEARTH community, which would enable additional provincial resources to house people with support services, as Langley has the third-highest unhoused population in Metro Vancouver.

Council voted to refer a motion on the European Chafer Beetle, an invasive species that is killing grass in our region, and associated repair of boulevard grass to the Environmental Sustainability Committee. Council also voted to refer a motion about litter management to various committees that are already working on litter management. As a reminder, if you do see a mess resulting from European Chafer Beetle or litter, please use the City’s Request for Service tool.

Council voted to defer deciding on a motion to study reducing speed limits on local streets until after Council adopts a new Transportation Plan, which is scheduled for consideration this year. This new plan will also speak to reducing speeds on local streets. Council wanted to ensure we weren’t duplicating staff efforts. Similarly, Council voted to defer deciding on a motion to request that City staff develop a framework to establish a Community Safety Officer department until after Council hears back from our Citizens' Assembly, which will make recommendations on how to enhance community safety in a month's time.

Langley City currently has a simple traffic calming policy where a resident needs to gather signatures from 10 or 50% of residents (whichever is less) in an area that would benefit directly from traffic calming, which is at a minimum the block on which traffic calming is being requested. This is a low barrier, but a barrier nonetheless, to ensure that there is some level of support for traffic calming before City staff will take further action. When I was on Council back in 2020, we implemented the current process, as the City was handling traffic calming requests in an ad hoc manner, which was putting a strain on staff time and frustrating residents. Some Councillors wanted to change the policy, including by removing the need to gather signatures. After a robust discussion, Council voted to maintain the current policy.

Two other motions were not seconded (on council meeting seating arrangements and consulting contracts), which means they weren’t debated, and another was withdrawn (on yard waste collection).